Hello, Is it ok to commit?
BR, Terry > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry....@arm.com] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:40 AM > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > Subject: RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for > case pr42894.c > > Ping. > > BR, > Terry > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry....@arm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:46 PM > > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > > Subject: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for > > case pr42894.c > > > > Hello, > > > > I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the > > patch intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok > > to commit to trunk? > > > > BR, > > Terry > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > 2011-08-25 Terry Guo <terry....@arm.com> > > > > * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip > > architecture conflict. > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c > > index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644 > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > > /* { dg-do compile } */ > > /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */ > > /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */ > > +/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */ > > > > extern __thread int t;
