>> The patch is OK for trunk. > > thanks a lot. Will commit soon.
Committed as r241870. Thanks again. Cheers, Janus >> On 5 November 2016 at 10:15, Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> here is a patch that I had submitted already in February (see >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00011.html). Unfortunately >>> it was never approved and I got distracted with other things and >>> forgot about it. >>> >>> It's a diagnostics patch, which makes sure that the responsible flag >>> is printed in several warning messages (for which this was still >>> missing). As a small extra the patch also mentions the -Wpedantic flag >>> in the gfortran documentation. >>> >>> Fortunately the patch still applies cleanly and regtests without >>> failures on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Janus >>> >>> >>> 2016-11-05 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> >>> Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <m...@gcc.gnu.org> >>> >>> PR fortran/69495 >>> * invoke.texi: Mention -Wpedantic as an alias of -pedantic. >>> * check.c (gfc_check_transfer): Mention responsible flag in warning >>> message. >>> * frontend-passes.c (do_warn_function_elimination): Ditto. >>> * resolve.c (resolve_elemental_actual): Ditto. >>> (resolve_operator): Ditto. >>> (warn_unused_fortran_label): Ditto. >>> * trans-common.c (translate_common): Ditto. >>> >>> >>> 2016-11-05 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> >>> Dominique d'Humieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr> >>> >>> PR fortran/69495 >>> * gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_6.f90: Use -Wpedantic flag. >> >> >> >> -- >> The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits. >> >> Albert Einstein
