Hi! The following testcase ICEs on x86_64-linux with -O1, the problem is that we expand assignment from COMPONENT_REF of MEM_REF into a V4SImode SSA_NAME. The MEM_REF has non-addressable DCmode var inside of it, and type of a struct containing a single V4SImode element.
The bug seems to be that if the op0 (i.e. get_inner_reference expanded) is a CONCAT and we want a reference that covers all bits of the CONCAT, we just short path it and return it immediately, rather than trying to convert it to the requested mode. I've bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux the following patch, which takes the short path only if we want a complex mode. The only place it makes a difference in both bootstraps/regtests was this new testcase. Though, perhaps COMPLEX_MODE_P (mode1) is also wrong, if mode1 isn't GET_MODE (op0), then we still will return something with unexpected mode (e.g. DCmode vs. CDImode); I wonder if for such mismatches we shouldn't just force_reg (convert_modes ()) each CONCAT operand separately and create a new CONCAT. Do we have a guarantee that COMPLEX_MODE_P (GET_MODE (op0)) if op0 is CONCAT? 2016-10-27 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR rtl-optimization/77919 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1) <normal_inner_ref>: Force CONCAT into MEM if mode1 is not a complex mode. * g++.dg/torture/pr77919.C: New test. --- gcc/expr.c.jj 2016-10-27 20:50:22.699586175 +0200 +++ gcc/expr.c 2016-10-27 21:15:30.146309091 +0200 @@ -10421,7 +10421,8 @@ expand_expr_real_1 (tree exp, rtx target if (GET_CODE (op0) == CONCAT && !must_force_mem) { if (bitpos == 0 - && bitsize == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (op0))) + && bitsize == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (op0)) + && COMPLEX_MODE_P (mode1)) { if (reversep) op0 = flip_storage_order (GET_MODE (op0), op0); --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr77919.C.jj 2016-10-27 21:15:19.883440139 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr77919.C 2016-10-27 21:16:01.694906242 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +// PR rtl-optimization/77919 +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-psabi" } + +struct A { A (double) {} _Complex double i; }; +typedef int __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))) B; +typedef struct { B b; } C; +struct D { D (const B &x) : b (x) {} B b; }; +static inline B foo (const double *x) { C *a; a = (C *) x; return a->b; } +static inline D baz (const A &x) { return foo ((double *) &x); } +D b = baz (0); Jakub