On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Bin.Cheng <amker.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, Jeff Law wrote: >> >>> Nit. I don't think you want a comma after "so". And it looks like your >>> comment got truncated as well. >>> >>> With the comment above fixed, this is fine for the trunk. >> >> I'm terribly sorry to have dropped the ball here, but I've committed this >> now after not even a year ;-/ (r241374) Obviously after rebootstrapping >> with all,ada languages. I also did some benchmark run which should be >> taken with a grain of salt as the machine had fairly variant results but >> the improvements are real, though perhaps not always in that range (it's a >> normal three repeats run). I'm really curious if our automatic tester can >> pick up similar improvements, because if so, it's extreme (5 to 15 percent >> in some benchmarks) and we can brag about it for GCC 7 ;-) > This is nice, thanks for doing it. I will check the improvement on AArch64. Hi, Unfortunately I didn't reproduce the improvement in my run on AArch64, I will double check if I made some mistakes.
Thanks, bin >> >> 400.perlbench 9770 519 18.8 * 9770 508 19.2 * >> 401.bzip2 9650 668 14.5 * 9650 666 14.5 * >> 403.gcc 8050 455 17.7 * 8050 432 18.6 * >> 429.mcf 9120 477 19.1 * 9120 467 19.5 * >> 445.gobmk 10490 643 16.3 * 10490 644 16.3 * >> 456.hmmer 9330 641 14.6 * 9330 614 15.2 * >> 458.sjeng 12100 784 15.4 * 12100 762 15.9 * >> 462.libquantum 20720 605 34.2 * 20720 600 34.5 * >> 464.h264ref 22130 969 22.8 * 22130 969 22.8 * >> 471.omnetpp 6250 438 14.3 * 6250 358 17.5 * >> 473.astar 7020 494 14.2 * 7020 492 14.3 * >> 483.xalancbmk 6900 342 20.2 * 6900 336 20.6 * >> Est. SPECint(R)_base2006 17.9 >> Est. SPECint2006 18.5 >> >> 410.bwaves 13590 563 24.1 * 13590 506 26.9 * >> 416.gamess NR NR >> 433.milc 9180 375 24.5 * 9180 349 26.3 * >> 434.zeusmp 9100 433 21.0 * 9100 423 21.5 * >> 435.gromacs 7140 402 17.7 * 7140 411 17.4 * >> 436.cactusADM 11950 486 24.6 * 11950 486 24.6 * >> 437.leslie3d 9400 421 22.4 * 9400 419 22.4 * >> 444.namd 8020 520 15.4 * 8020 520 15.4 * >> 447.dealII NR NR >> 450.soplex 8340 393 21.2 * 8340 391 21.3 * >> 453.povray 5320 277 19.2 * 5320 278 19.1 * >> 454.calculix 8250 453 18.2 * 8250 460 17.9 * >> 459.GemsFDTD 10610 542 19.6 * 10610 537 19.8 * >> 465.tonto 9840 492 20.0 * 9840 491 20.0 * >> 470.lbm 13740 466 29.5 * 13740 430 32.0 * >> 481.wrf 11170 492 22.7 * 11170 457 24.4 * >> 482.sphinx3 19490 659 29.6 * 19490 655 29.8 * >> Est. SPECfp(R)_base2006 21.6 >> Est. SPECfp2006 22.1 >> >> >> Ciao, >> Michael.
