On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:33:14PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> > 2016-10-21 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
> >
> > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fold_builtin): Handle IX86_BUILTIN_INFQ
> > and IX86_BUILTIN_HUGE_VALQ here ...
> > (ix86_expand_builtin): ... not here.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
> > Committed to mainline SVN.
>
> Do you know if it's possible to make architecture-specific built-in
> functions into aliases of architecture-independent ones? That would be
> the ideal thing for the *q __float128 functions - make them aliases of the
> *f128 architecture-independent ones, and so subject to any
> architecture-independent optimizations (for these two there's nothing more
> than folding to do, but at some point I expect we'll optimize fabsf128 and
> copysignf128 as much as the corresponding functions for float / double /
> long double, for example).
I guess e.g. ix86_fold_builtin could just fold those builtins into calls to
the arch-indepdendent ones, so while it wouldn't be an alias, it could be
represented as the arch-independent builtin from gimplification onwards.
Jakub
