2011/9/7 Benjamin Kosnik <b...@redhat.com>: > > Here's the tuple additions for constexpr now that it's ok to return > this.
Btw.: I would have expected that you can make __tuple_compare<>::__eq/__less also constexpr. These are static functions, thus __tuple_compare itself need not to be a literal type (Disclaimer: I did not check all __tuple_compare specializations). > Is tuple_cat now considered conforming? No, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50159 > If so, certain signatures can be constexpr. Yes. - Daniel
