On 2016.10.18 at 05:13 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2016.10.17 at 17:23 -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77916 identifies a situation
> > where SLSR will ICE when exposed to a cast from integer to pointer.  This
> > is because we try to convert a PLUS_EXPR with an addend of -1 * S into a
> > MINUS_EXPR with a subtrahend of S, but the base operand is unexpectedly
> > of pointer type.  This patch recognizes when pointer arithmetic is taking
> > place and ensures that we use a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR at all such times.  In
> > the case of the PR, this occurs in the logic where the stride S is a known
> > constant value, but the same problem could occur when it is an SSA_NAME
> > without known value.  Both possibilities are handled here.
> > 
> > Fixing the code to ensure that the unknown stride case always uses an 
> > initializer for a negative increment allows us to remove the stopgap fix
> > added for PR77937 as well.
> > 
> > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
> > regressions, committed.
> 
> Perhaps you should consider building ffmpeg with -O3 -march=amdfam10 on
> X86_64 before committing these patches, because you broke it for the
> third time in the last couple of days.
> 
> markus@x4 ffmpeg % cat h264dsp.i
> extern int fn2(int);
> extern int fn3(int);
> int a, b, c;
> void fn1(long p1) {
>   char *d;
>   for (;; d += p1) {
>     d[0] = fn2(1 >> c >> 1);
>     fn2(c >> a);
>     d[1] = fn3(d[1]) >> 1;
>     d[6] = fn3(d[6] * b + 1) >> 1;
>     d[7] = fn3(d[7] * b + 1) >> 1;
>     d[8] = fn3(d[8] * b + 1) >> 1;
>   }
> }
> 
> markus@x4 ffmpeg % gcc -O3 -march=amdfam10 -c h264dsp.i
> h264dsp.i: In function ‘fn1’:
> h264dsp.i:4:6: internal compiler error: in replace_one_candidate, at 
> gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3375
>  void fn1(long p1) {
>       ^~~
> 0x12773a9 replace_one_candidate
>         ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3375
> 0x127af77 replace_profitable_candidates
>         ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3486
> 0x127aeeb replace_profitable_candidates
>         ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3495
> 0x127f3ee analyze_candidates_and_replace
>         ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3574
> 0x127f3ee execute
>         ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3648

Just figured out that this testcase is identical to:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr77937-2.c 

So please run the testsuite on X86_64 in the future.

-- 
Markus

Reply via email to