On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
<senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   The fix for PR 52085 went into trunk when trunk was 6.0. I ran into the
>   same issue on a gcc 5.x and found that the fix didn't get backported.
>
>   Bootstrapped and reg tested below patch with x86-64-pc-linux. Ok to
>   backport to gcc-5-branch?

Ok with me but please double-check there was no fallout.

Richard.

> Regards
> Senthil
>
> gcc/c/ChangeLog
>
> 2016-10-17  Senthil Kumar Selvaraj  <senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com>
>
>   Backport from mainline
>         2015-04-25  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>
>         PR c/52085
>         * c-decl.c (finish_enum): Copy over TYPE_ALIGN.  Also check for "mode"
>         attribute.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2016-10-17  Senthil Kumar Selvaraj  <senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com>
>
>         Backport from mainline
>         2015-04-25  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>
>         PR c/52085
>         * gcc.dg/enum-incomplete-2.c: New test.
>         * gcc.dg/enum-mode-1.c: New test.
>
>
> diff --git gcc/c/c-decl.c gcc/c/c-decl.c
> index d1e7444..c508e7f 100644
> --- gcc/c/c-decl.c
> +++ gcc/c/c-decl.c
> @@ -8050,7 +8050,7 @@ finish_enum (tree enumtype, tree values, tree 
> attributes)
>
>    /* If the precision of the type was specified with an attribute and it
>       was too small, give an error.  Otherwise, use it.  */
> -  if (TYPE_PRECISION (enumtype))
> +  if (TYPE_PRECISION (enumtype) && lookup_attribute ("mode", attributes))
>      {
>        if (precision > TYPE_PRECISION (enumtype))
>         {
> @@ -8078,6 +8078,7 @@ finish_enum (tree enumtype, tree values, tree 
> attributes)
>    TYPE_MIN_VALUE (enumtype) = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (tem);
>    TYPE_MAX_VALUE (enumtype) = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (tem);
>    TYPE_UNSIGNED (enumtype) = TYPE_UNSIGNED (tem);
> +  TYPE_ALIGN (enumtype) = TYPE_ALIGN (tem);
>    TYPE_SIZE (enumtype) = 0;
>    TYPE_PRECISION (enumtype) = TYPE_PRECISION (tem);
>
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/enum-incomplete-2.c 
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/enum-incomplete-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5970551
> --- /dev/null
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/enum-incomplete-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +/* PR c/52085 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "" } */
> +
> +#define SA(X) _Static_assert((X),#X)
> +
> +enum e1;
> +enum e1 { A } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +enum e2 { B } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +SA (sizeof (enum e1) == sizeof (enum e2));
> +SA (_Alignof (enum e1) == _Alignof (enum e2));
> +
> +enum e3;
> +enum e3 { C = 256 } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +enum e4 { D = 256 } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +SA (sizeof (enum e3) == sizeof (enum e4));
> +SA (_Alignof (enum e3) == _Alignof (enum e4));
> +
> +enum e5;
> +enum e5 { E = __INT_MAX__ } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +enum e6 { F = __INT_MAX__ } __attribute__ ((__packed__));
> +SA (sizeof (enum e5) == sizeof (enum e6));
> +SA (_Alignof (enum e5) == _Alignof (enum e6));
> +
> +enum e7;
> +enum e7 { G } __attribute__ ((__mode__(__byte__)));
> +enum e8 { H } __attribute__ ((__mode__(__byte__)));
> +SA (sizeof (enum e7) == sizeof (enum e8));
> +SA (_Alignof (enum e7) == _Alignof (enum e8));
> +
> +enum e9;
> +enum e9 { I } __attribute__ ((__packed__, __mode__(__byte__)));
> +enum e10 { J } __attribute__ ((__packed__, __mode__(__byte__)));
> +SA (sizeof (enum e9) == sizeof (enum e10));
> +SA (_Alignof (enum e9) == _Alignof (enum e10));
> +
> +enum e11;
> +enum e11 { K } __attribute__ ((__mode__(__word__)));
> +enum e12 { L } __attribute__ ((__mode__(__word__)));
> +SA (sizeof (enum e11) == sizeof (enum e12));
> +SA (_Alignof (enum e11) == _Alignof (enum e12));
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/enum-mode-1.c 
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/enum-mode-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a701123
> --- /dev/null
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/enum-mode-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +
> +enum e1 { A = 256 } __attribute__((__mode__(__byte__))); /* { dg-error 
> "specified mode too small for enumeral values" } */
> +enum e2 { B = 256 } __attribute__((__packed__, __mode__(__byte__))); /* { 
> dg-error "specified mode too small for enumeral values" } */
> +
> +enum e3 { C = __INT_MAX__ } __attribute__((__mode__(__QI__))); /* { dg-error 
> "specified mode too small for enumeral values" } */
> +enum e4 { D = __INT_MAX__ } __attribute__((__packed__, __mode__(__QI__))); 
> /* { dg-error "specified mode too small for enumeral values" } */
> +
> +enum e5 { E = __INT_MAX__ } __attribute__((__mode__(__HI__))); /* { dg-error 
> "specified mode too small for enumeral values" } */
> +enum e6 { F = __INT_MAX__ } __attribute__((__packed__, __mode__(__HI__))); 
> /* { dg-error "specified mode too small for enumeral values" } */

Reply via email to