* Marek Polacek: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:46:08PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >> I'm also wondering about the situation where not a single break is used >> in all of the cases. It would be best not to warn here. > > This is tricky and I'm afraid all I can offer here is to use the diagnostics > pragma to suppress the warning for Duff's device-like constructs.
Would it make sense to apply the fallthrough attribute to the entire switch statement to address such scenarios? Currently, that does not seem supported.
