On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Steve Kargl
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Fritz,
>
> I was lookng at part of a previous patch that I committed for you.
> In interface.c, one now has
>
> static int
> compare_components (gfc_component *cmp1, gfc_component *cmp2,
> gfc_symbol *derived1, gfc_symbol *derived2)
> {
> gfc_symbol *d1, *d2;
> bool anonymous = false;
>
> /* Unions, maps, and anonymous structures all have names like "[xX]X$\d+"
> which should not be compared. */
> d1 = cmp1->ts.u.derived;
> d2 = cmp2->ts.u.derived;
> if ( (d1 && (d1->attr.flavor == FL_STRUCT || d1->attr.flavor == FL_UNION)
> && ISUPPER (cmp1->name[1]))
> || (d2 && (d2->attr.flavor == FL_STRUCT || d2->attr.flavor == FL_UNION)
> && ISUPPER (cmp1->name[1])))
> anonymous = true;
>
> Is the second ISUPPER suppose to have cmp2->name[1]?
>
> --
> Steve
This above is pretty clearly a typo. The attached patch committed as
obvious r239706.
---
Fritz Reese
2016-08-23 Fritz Reese <[email protected]>
gcc/fortran/
* interface.c (compare_components): Fix typo in name check conditional.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.c b/gcc/fortran/interface.c
index 5bd1279..17500c9 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/interface.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ compare_components (gfc_component *cmp1, gfc_component *cmp2,
if ( (d1 && (d1->attr.flavor == FL_STRUCT || d1->attr.flavor == FL_UNION)
&& ISUPPER (cmp1->name[1]))
|| (d2 && (d2->attr.flavor == FL_STRUCT || d2->attr.flavor == FL_UNION)
- && ISUPPER (cmp1->name[1])))
+ && ISUPPER (cmp2->name[1])))
anonymous = true;
if (!anonymous && strcmp (cmp1->name, cmp2->name) != 0)
