On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > Not sure if error is appropriate here, or whether I should downgrade the
> > error to a warning and ignore the attribute.
>
> I'd say the semantics for uses of attributes that currently parse should
> remain unchanged: they should not be reinterpreted (for non-fallthrough
> attributes) to be attributes on a statement rather than on an empty
> declaration.
Thanks, makes sense. I've done so now. I'll post the most recent version
of the -Wimplicit-fallthrough patch after it passes testing on a few systems.
Marek
