Sure, the patch is safe enough. Done. Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 00:27 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > The DFP classes are treated as transparent aggregates, so they get > mangled and passed like their first field. In the testcase it is > defined to have a base class, so the first field is an artificial base > field, which doesn't make any sense. > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk. Thanks for fixing this Jason! The same error also occurs on 4.6. Do you plan on fixing it there too? Peter
