On 08/09/16 22:48, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I think from Eric's comment in get_inner_ref it can be possible
>> in Ada that the outer object is accidentally byte-aligned
>> but the inner reference is not. In that case I think it is
>> better to generate a BIT_FIELD_REF instead of a COMPONENT_REF.
>
> The patch says get_bit_range instead... The comment therein means that
> bitfields can be nested in Ada: you can have a bitfield in a record which is
> itself a bitfield in another record.
>
>> Eric do you agree? Are there any Ada test cases where the
>> pcom optimization jumps in?
>
> According to the comment, data-ref analysis punts on bit offsets so I'm not
> sure how boff can be not byte-aligned.
>
I mean in dr_analyze_innermost, we have:
base = get_inner_reference (ref, &pbitsize, &pbitpos, &poffset, &pmode,
&punsignedp, &preversep, &pvolatilep);
gcc_assert (base != NULL_TREE);
if (pbitpos % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0)
{
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
fprintf (dump_file, "failed: bit offset alignment.\n");
return false;
}
if (preversep)
{
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
fprintf (dump_file, "failed: reverse storage order.\n");
return false;
}
and that means that get_inner_reference on the outermost ref
returns a byte-aligned bit-offset, and from there I would
think it has the knowledge, when to punt on reversep and
when the offset is not byte-aligned.
But in get_bit_range we have a bit-field with arbitrary
bit-offset, but surprisingly the
get_inner_reference (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0)) did not return
byte-aligned bit-offset. I doubt that data-ref ananlysis
ever cares about the byte-alignment of intermediate
refs.
We know that the difference between the innermost ref
and the outer ref is byte-aligned, but we do not know
that the same is true for offset between the COMPONENT_REF
and the outer ref.
I mean boff is essentially the difference between
bitpos of get_inner_reference(exp) and
bitpos of get_inner_reference(TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0))
This would be exposed by my patch, because previously
we always generated BIT_FIELD_REFS, with bit-offset 0,
but the MEM_REF at the byte-offset there is in all likelihood
pretty much unaligned, the MEM_REF at the COMPONENT_REF
is likely more aligned and allows better code for ARM processors,
but only if the MEM_REF is at a byte-aligned offset at all,
otherwise the whole transformation would be wrong.
Thanks
Bernd.
