On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:27:36PM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote: > On 08/02/2016 03:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:03:42PM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote: > >> On 07/29/2016 10:47 AM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > >>> + "xsxexpdp %0,%x1" > >>> + [(set_attr "type" "fp")]) > >> > >> Type should be 'integer'. > > > > It has VSX regs as input, integer is worse than fpsimple here, I think? > > Or vecsimple, that seems better yes. > > It's a 2 cycle op that executes in the ALU pipe, just like other integer ops. > vecsimple would be worse since those consume a superslice, which this op > doesn't. >
Ah yes. But why not fpsimple? It schedules the same as e.g. fmr and fabs? Segher