On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:55 PM, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > > OK? As this is an ABI break, I'm not proposing for it to go back to GCC 6, > though it will apply cleanly there if the maintainers support that. >
What do you mean by "ABI break"? AFAICS, with this patch, it conforms to AAPCS. The subject leads me thinking about the handling of HVA of float16. -- Yao (齐尧)
