On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote: > Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Richard Sandiford >> <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> This is the move-scheduling patch itself. It should be fairly >>> self-explanatory. Let me know if it isn't, and I'll try to improve >>> the commentary. >> >> Can you add some testcases? > > I don't think it's an easy thing to test for. E.g. with the resampling > loop in the covering message, there might well be a reasonable ii=27 > schedule that doesn't need as many moves.
So, does it only improve code generation or does it expose more loops as SMS candidates? If the former, ok ... Richard. > Richard >
