On 08/04/16 06:39, Martin Liška wrote:
On 08/03/2016 04:22 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Martin,
As I've going through all PRs related to gcov-profile, I've noticed this PR.
Current implementation of cycle detection in gcov is very poor, leading to
extreme run time
for cases like mentioned in the PR (which does not contain a cycle). Thank to
Joshua, I've
grabbed his patch and removed the scaffolding (classes: Arc, Block, ...) he
did. After doing that
the patch is quite subtle and fast (of course).
sorry to be a pain, but could you split the patch into
a) formatting changes
b) the clever bits
the formatting changes can then (probably) be applied as obvious.
nathan
That's all right, it's my mistake that I messed up coding style issues and
core of that patch.
Thanks. the formatting patch is fine. Reading the other one next ...
nathan
