On 31 July 2016 at 14:49, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > A number of tests are now failing because their dg-error lines need > adjusting: > > FAIL: 20_util/declval/requirements/1_neg.cc (test for errors, line 2259) > FAIL: 20_util/declval/requirements/1_neg.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc (test for errors, line 796) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg1.cc (test for errors, line > 246) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg1.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg2.cc (test for errors, line > 247) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg2.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg3.cc (test for errors, line > 249) > FAIL: 20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg3.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 20_util/make_signed/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for errors, > line 1924) > FAIL: 20_util/make_signed/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for errors, > line 1777) > FAIL: 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for errors, > line 1820) > FAIL: 20_util/make_unsigned/requirements/typedefs_neg.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc (test for errors, line > 435) > FAIL: 20_util/ratio/operations/ops_overflow_neg.cc (test for excess errors) > > Somebody didn't run the whole testsuite.
I will send a patch shortly.
