On 07/22/2016 01:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
@@ -32335,6 +32341,7 @@ rs6000_handle_altivec_attribute (tree *node,
        case V4SImode: case V8HImode: case V16QImode: case V4SFmode:
        case V2DImode: case V2DFmode:
          result = type;
+         gcc_fallthrough ();
        default: break;
        }
       break;
@@ -32345,6 +32352,7 @@ rs6000_handle_altivec_attribute (tree *node,
        case SImode: case V4SImode: result = bool_V4SI_type_node; break;
        case HImode: case V8HImode: result = bool_V8HI_type_node; break;
        case QImode: case V16QImode: result = bool_V16QI_type_node;
+         gcc_fallthrough ();
        default: break;
        }
       break;
@@ -32352,6 +32360,7 @@ rs6000_handle_altivec_attribute (tree *node,
       switch (mode)
        {
        case V8HImode: result = pixel_V8HI_type_node;
+         gcc_fallthrough ();
        default: break;
        }
     default: break;

I thought we don't warn on these anymore?

Also, please just add a break for cases like this. The last one ought to be an if statement in any case.


Bernd

Reply via email to