Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.

Richard.

2016-07-21  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/71947
        * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_assert): Singleton symbolic
        ranges have useful limit_vr information.

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp102.c: New testcase.

Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/tree-vrp.c      (revision 238469)
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c      (working copy)
*************** extract_range_from_assert (value_range *
*** 1513,1522 ****
    limit_vr = (TREE_CODE (limit) == SSA_NAME) ? get_value_range (limit) : NULL;
  
    /* LIMIT's range is only interesting if it has any useful information.  */
!   if (limit_vr
!       && (limit_vr->type == VR_UNDEFINED
!         || limit_vr->type == VR_VARYING
!         || symbolic_range_p (limit_vr)))
      limit_vr = NULL;
  
    /* Initially, the new range has the same set of equivalences of
--- 1514,1526 ----
    limit_vr = (TREE_CODE (limit) == SSA_NAME) ? get_value_range (limit) : NULL;
  
    /* LIMIT's range is only interesting if it has any useful information.  */
!   if (! limit_vr
!       || limit_vr->type == VR_UNDEFINED
!       || limit_vr->type == VR_VARYING
!       || (symbolic_range_p (limit_vr)
!         && ! (limit_vr->type == VR_RANGE
!               && (limit_vr->min == limit_vr->max
!                   || operand_equal_p (limit_vr->min, limit_vr->max, 0)))))
      limit_vr = NULL;
  
    /* Initially, the new range has the same set of equivalences of
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp102.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp102.c      (revision 0)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp102.c      (working copy)
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,18 ----
+ /* { dg-do compile } */
+ /* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fdump-tree-vrp1" } */
+ 
+ int f(int x, int y)
+ { 
+   int ret; 
+   if (x == y)
+     ret = x ^ y;
+   else
+     ret = 1;
+ 
+   return ret;
+ } 
+ 
+ /* We should have computed x ^ y as zero and propagated the result into the
+    PHI feeding the result.  */
+ 
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "ret_\[0-9\]+ = PHI <\[01\]\\\(\[0-9\]+\\\), 
\[01\]\\\(\[0-9\]+\\\)>" "vrp1" } } */

Reply via email to