Hi,
The patch fixes a couple of testsuite failures that show up for the
avr target because it has different sizes for longs and pointers (4
bytes versus 2), by explicitly disabling the warning for avr.
Does this make sense? Skipping the test by requiring ptr32plus would
have worked, but this lets the test run for avr and for compile tests
that don't look at output, nothing should hopefully break. Is this a
good strategy in general?
Regards
Senthil
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69352.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69352.c
index ad718b9..cf06383 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69352.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69352.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-pointer-to-int-cast" { target { "avr-*-*" } }
} */
int a[10][14], b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i;
void bar (void);
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr71866.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr71866.c
index e1b36cb..c074ad4 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr71866.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr71866.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-pre -fcode-hoisting" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-int-to-pointer-cast" { target { "avr-*-*" } }
} */
typedef unsigned char u8;
extern unsigned long pci_io_base;
--
2.7.4
