On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This changes my previous patch to use a separate base_quadfloat_support > effective target that can be used in conjunction with either the float128 > or __float128 effective targets, and modifies the tests accordingly. > I dropped adding support for float128-exact-underflow.c for now; that can > be addressed later if desired. > > Tested on powerpc64[le]-unknown-linux-gnu. Is this ok for trunk, and > eventual backport to gcc-6-branch? > > Thanks, > Bill > > > 2016-07-01 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > * gcc.dg/const-float128-ped.c: Require __float128 effective > target, and specify additional options for powerpc*-*-*. > * gcc.dg/const-float128.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c: Require > __float128 and base_quadfloat_support effective targets, and > specify additional options for powerpc*-*-*. > * gcc.dg/torture/float128-div-underflow.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/torture/float128-extend-nan.c: Require > __float128 and base-quadfloat_support effective targets, and > specify additional options for powerpc*-*-*. > * gcc.dg/torture/float128-nan.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128-timode-2.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128-timode-3.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float128-timode.c: Likewise. > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target___float128): > New. > (check_effective_target_base_quadword_support): New.
This is okay with the dg-add-options change that Joseph recommends. Thanks, David
