On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:35:28PM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > Testing on a Power9 simulator revealed an error in the code emitted for > the *altivec_vpermr_<mode>_internal define_insn pattern. Two of the > operands of the vpermr operand had been emitted in wrong order. This > patch corrects the error.
"Oops" :-) > The patch has bootstrapped and regression tested on > powerpc64le-unknown-linux with no regressions. Is this ok > for the trunk and for backporting to GCC6 after burn-in > on the trunk? Yes, thank you! Segher