On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:35:28PM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> Testing on a Power9 simulator revealed an error in the code emitted for
> the *altivec_vpermr_<mode>_internal define_insn pattern.  Two of the
> operands of the vpermr operand had been emitted in wrong order.  This 
> patch corrects the error.

"Oops" :-)

> The patch has bootstrapped and regression tested on
> powerpc64le-unknown-linux with no regressions.  Is this ok
> for the trunk and for backporting to GCC6 after burn-in
> on the trunk?

Yes, thank you!


Segher

Reply via email to