On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > > On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > > Ping. This patch > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01685.html> is pending > > review. Built-in functions are available in the followup patch > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01702.html>. > > I can't ack the patch, but the rs6000 bits of your original patch look fine. > I didn't mean to ask you to change those -- I hadn't read the patch > and was just commenting on your description of the patch, and I realize > now that I wasn't careful in my use of language. I apologize for the > miscommunication there. We should keep the check on > FLOAT128_IEEE_P to determine which mode is __float128 for now, > until the whole issue of two 128-bit floats is behind us.
In that case, consider the relevant part of patch version 1 to be substituted into version 3 for the rest of the review. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
