On 06/23/2016 09:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN1AIdEC1Ev" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN1AIU9may_aliasdEC1Ev" } } */
I find this rather worrying.
In glibc, we want to use the may_alias attribute on struct
sockaddr_storage for POSIX conformance. We can only do this if it does
not affect name mangling in application code.
If we define a struct like this:
extern "C" {
struct sockaddr_storage
{
int ss_family;
char pad[100];
};
};
would your patch change the assembler name of a C++ function with the
following declaration
void get_address(struct sockaddr_storage *);
?
Thanks,
Florian
