On 06/20/2016 10:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
+ && tree_int_cst_equal (lhs, null_pointer_node) + && !tree_int_cst_equal (rhs, integer_zero_node))
Not integer_zerop?
+ "invalid conversion involving a null pointer");
...
+ "invalid conversion from %qT to %qT",
The conversion isn't invalid, it just isn't a constant expression. For the null pointer to pointer conversion, does this properly allow conversion to void* or to base*?
+ if (integer_zerop (op))
...
+ else if (!integer_zerop (op))
The second test seems redundant. Jason
