On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no > regressions. All new tests pass except for the test for vspltish in > the infinity test; this relies on a patch in progress to fix things so we > generate that instead of an inferior sequence. Is this ok for trunk, > and for 6.2 after an appropriate burn-in period?
Depending on how long it takes my _FloatN / _FloatNx patch to get reviewed, it might be better to avoid adding the built-in functions as target-specific on trunk. Adding them as architecture-independent would be extremely straightforward once the support for the types is there, and then the architecture-specific versions would only be needed for GCC 6. (The insn patterns and tests would still be relevant for trunk.) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
