On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I know a short version of this was applied, but am wondering
> whether to retain the example (and a note on -flifetime-dse=1),
> both per the discussion in February?
>
> Want to make those enhancements?
And here is one small change I just applied...
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -r1.85 changes.html
--- changes.html 8 Jun 2016 15:00:53 -0000 1.85
+++ changes.html 20 Jun 2016 10:33:35 -0000
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@
<code>-fconcepts</code>.</li>
<li><code>-flifetime-dse</code> is more
aggressive in dead-store elimination in situations where
- a memory store to a location precedes a constructor to the
+ a memory store to a location precedes a constructor to that
memory location.</li>
<li>G++ now supports
<a
href="https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx1z.html";>C++17</a>
