You’re right, I don’t need the -O0. I’d like to leave the dg-skip-if in place
because I’m worried about older processors not defining altivec, etc.
Thanks!
Bill
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:41:26AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> When changing vec_ld and vec_st to be expanded during parsing, I
>> missed a subtle case that happens only for C++. If the base address
>> argument has an array type, this doesn’t get converted to a pointer.
>> For our purposes, we need the pointer, and it’s safe to make that
>> conversion, so this patch performs that adjustment. I’ve added a
>> test to the C++ torture bucket to verify this now works.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
>> regressions. Is this ok for trunk, and eventual backport to the 6 branch?
>
> Okay. A few questions about the testcase...
>
>
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/ppc-ldst-array.C
>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64*-*-* } } } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "do not override mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } {
>> "-mcpu=power8" } } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -mcpu=power8" } */
>
> It's torture, do you need to force -O0? And the skip isn't necessary I think?
>
>
> Segher
>
