On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Apparently my r236430 change (trunk) and r236431 (6.x) broke the following
> testcase.  In the later similar change to gimple-fold.c in r236506
> I've added code to tweak gimple_call_fntype if we have newly one of the
> void something (void) __attribute__((noreturn)) functions like
> __builtin_unreachable or __cxa_pure_virtual, and drop the lhs even if it
> has been before non-POD, but the new fntype has void return type,
> but apparently we need to do the same in cgraph.c as well.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/6.2?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2016-06-02  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR middle-end/71387
>       * cgraph.c (cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_to_callee): If redirecting
>       to noreturn e->callee->decl that has void return type and void
>       arguments, adjust gimple_call_fntype and remove lhs even if it had
>       previously addressable type.
> 
>       * g++.dg/opt/pr71387.C: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/cgraph.c.jj   2016-05-26 10:37:54.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/cgraph.c      2016-06-02 17:17:58.963052785 +0200
> @@ -1512,8 +1512,20 @@ cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_to_calle
>        update_stmt_fn (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (e->caller->decl), new_stmt);
>      }
>  
> +  /* If changing the call to __cxa_pure_virtual or similar noreturn function,
> +     adjust gimple_call_fntype too.  */
> +  if (gimple_call_noreturn_p (new_stmt)
> +      && VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (e->callee->decl)))
> +      && TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (e->callee->decl))
> +      && (TREE_VALUE (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (e->callee->decl)))
> +       == void_type_node))
> +    gimple_call_set_fntype (new_stmt, TREE_TYPE (e->callee->decl));
> +
>    /* If the call becomes noreturn, remove the LHS if possible.  */
> -  if (gimple_call_noreturn_p (new_stmt) && should_remove_lhs_p (lhs))
> +  if (lhs
> +      && gimple_call_noreturn_p (new_stmt)
> +      && (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (gimple_call_fntype (new_stmt)))
> +       || should_remove_lhs_p (lhs)))
>      {
>        if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
>       {
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr71387.C.jj     2016-06-02 17:37:59.868769557 
> +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr71387.C        2016-06-02 17:23:51.000000000 
> +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +// PR middle-end/71387
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +// { dg-options "-Og" }
> +
> +struct A
> +{
> +  A ();
> +  inline A (const A &);
> +};
> +
> +struct B
> +{
> +  explicit B (unsigned long) : b(0), c(1) {}
> +  A a;
> +  unsigned long b;
> +  int c;
> +};
> +
> +struct C {};
> +
> +struct D
> +{
> +  explicit D (const C *) {}
> +};
> +
> +struct E : public D
> +{
> +  E (const C *x) : D(x) {}
> +  virtual A foo () const = 0;
> +  virtual A bar () const = 0;
> +};
> +
> +struct F : public B
> +{
> +  inline void baz ();
> +  F (const E *);
> +  const E *f;
> +};
> +
> +inline void
> +F::baz ()
> +{
> +  if (b == 0)
> +    a = f->bar ();
> +  else
> +    a = f->foo ();
> +}
> +
> +F::F (const E *) : B(4)
> +{
> +  baz ();
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to