Hi: Pending review.

Best - Marcel

> On 3 May 2016, at 10:40 PM, Marcel Böhme <boehme.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This fixes four access violations 
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70926). 
> 
> Two of these first read the value of a length variable len from the mangled 
> string, then strncpy len characters from the mangled string; more than 
> necessary.
> The other two read the value of an array index n from the mangled string, 
> which can be negative due to an overflow.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Test cases added 
> to libiberty/testsuite/demangler-expected and checked PR70926 is resolved.
> 
> Best regards,
> - Marcel
> 
> Index: libiberty/ChangeLog
> ===================================================================
> --- libiberty/ChangeLog       (revision 235801)
> +++ libiberty/ChangeLog       (working copy)
> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> +2016-05-03  Marcel Böhme  <boehme.mar...@gmail.com>
> +
> +     PR c++/70926
> +     * cplus-dem.c: Handle large values and overflow when demangling
> +     length variables. 
> +     (demangle_template_value_parm): Read only until end of mangled string.  
>  
> +     (do_hpacc_template_literal): Likewise.
> +     (do_type): Handle overflow when demangling array indices.
> +
> 2016-05-02  Marcel Böhme  <boehme.mar...@gmail.com>
> 
>       PR c++/70498
> Index: libiberty/cplus-dem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- libiberty/cplus-dem.c     (revision 235801)
> +++ libiberty/cplus-dem.c     (working copy)
> @@ -2051,7 +2051,8 @@ demangle_template_value_parm (struct work_stuff *w
>       else
>       {
>         int symbol_len  = consume_count (mangled);
> -       if (symbol_len == -1)
> +       if (symbol_len == -1 
> +           || symbol_len > (long) strlen (*mangled))
>           return -1;
>         if (symbol_len == 0)
>           string_appendn (s, "0", 1);
> @@ -3611,7 +3612,7 @@ do_type (struct work_stuff *work, const char **man
>       /* A back reference to a previously seen type */
>       case 'T':
>         (*mangled)++;
> -       if (!get_count (mangled, &n) || n >= work -> ntypes)
> +       if (!get_count (mangled, &n) || n < 0 || n >= work -> ntypes)
>           {
>             success = 0;
>           }
> @@ -3789,7 +3790,7 @@ do_type (struct work_stuff *work, const char **man
>     /* A back reference to a previously seen squangled type */
>     case 'B':
>       (*mangled)++;
> -      if (!get_count (mangled, &n) || n >= work -> numb)
> +      if (!get_count (mangled, &n) || n < 0 || n >= work -> numb)
>       success = 0;
>       else
>       string_append (result, work->btypevec[n]);
> @@ -4130,7 +4131,8 @@ do_hpacc_template_literal (struct work_stuff *work
> 
>   literal_len = consume_count (mangled);
> 
> -  if (literal_len <= 0)
> +  if (literal_len <= 0
> +      || literal_len > (long) strlen (*mangled))
>     return 0;
> 
>   /* Literal parameters are names of arrays, functions, etc.  and the
> Index: libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
> ===================================================================
> --- libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected     (revision 235801)
> +++ libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected     (working copy)
> @@ -4441,3 +4441,16 @@ __vt_90000000000cafebabe
> 
> _Z80800000000000000000000
> _Z80800000000000000000000
> +#
> +# Tests write access violation PR70926
> +
> +0__Ot2m02R5T0000500000
> +0__Ot2m02R5T0000500000
> +#
> +
> +0__GT50000000000_
> +0__GT50000000000_
> +#
> +
> +__t2m05B500000000000000000_
> +__t2m05B500000000000000000_
> 

Reply via email to