> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Sidwell [mailto:nathanmsidw...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Nathan Sidwell
> Sent: 09 May 2016 18:22
> To: Joey Ye; Richard Earnshaw; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [ARM] mno-pic-data-is-text-relative & msingle-pic-base
> 
> Joey,
> > This patch will do what you intend it to do. However, I am not sure in part
> related to VxWorks. The logic behind this patch is that -mno-pic-data-is-
> text-relative should enable -msingle-pic-base because otherwise it will be
> useless. The logic itself is orthogonal to OS. So I am not convinced the 'else
> if' shouldn't be just 'if'. It should not change VxWorks behaviour if VxWorks
> enables -msingle-pic-base explicitly. Or otherwise there is at least one use
> case that -mno-pic-data-is-text-relative can be used without -msingle-pic-
> base, which breaks the logic that this whole patch stands on.
> 
> VxWorks has two modes of code generation -- kernel and RTP.  RTPs don't
> have a fixed mapping between code and data (and use special sequence to
> initialize the PIC register, using vxworks-specific relocs).  Kernel mode
> doesn't support PIC code generation -- see config/vxworks.c
> 
> So I don't think there's a problem.
No other commit. OK for me though I cannot approve it.

- Joey

Reply via email to