On 8 May 2016 at 14:48, Daniel Krügler <daniel.krueg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you considered to test against decay instead of > remove_reference/remove_const? That would be similar to other places > in the standard. (I also believe that your fix actually should be > submitted as an LWG issue)
STL is about to submit the fix as an LWG issue. He seemed to agree that the fix is what he intends to submit. Using decay instead of remove_reference/remove_const is fine by me, but I suppose it shouldn't make a difference here other than notational brevity?
