On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:29:33AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:22:41AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > A program containing an array of structs containing a VLA caused ICE with 
> > UBSAN
> > bounds checking, because in get_ubsan_type_info_for_type we asserted that 
> > the
> > size of a type fits uhwi, which implies it is an INTEGER_CST.  But that's 
> > not
> > the case for a struct with VLA.  However, the assert here is bogus, for
> > !REAL_TYPE and !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P get_ubsan_type_info_for_type just returns 0.
> > And since tree_to_uhwi has
> >   gcc_assert (tree_fits_uhwi_p (t));
> > there's no need to duplicate that for the REAL_TYPE / INTEGRAL_TYPE_P cases.
> 
> Yeah, and for NULL TYPE_SIZE we just segfault, not really need to assert
> that.
> > 
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> Ok, thanks.  If it affects 6.x branch, it is ok there as well.

Yeah, it does, and since I need to test a backport for PR70342 anyway,
I'll add it to my testing & commit it afterwards.

Thanks,

        Marek

Reply via email to