On 04/28/2016 01:15 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
So if my understanding is correct, additional !cfun check can be acceptable as a fix along the existing hack. Perhaps with a note about the nature of the hack.
Yes, I think Thomas' patch is ok. Bernd
On 04/28/2016 01:15 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
So if my understanding is correct, additional !cfun check can be acceptable as a fix along the existing hack. Perhaps with a note about the nature of the hack.
Yes, I think Thomas' patch is ok. Bernd