On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:04:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > While predicate_mem_writes has a check to skip conditions that were
> >> > evaluated
> >> > to true, it's lacking the same check for false, so we hit an assert
> >> > later on.
> >> > So I'm adding is_false_predicate. Maybe it should be added to other
> >> > spots as
> >> > well, but I'm not sure about that.
> >> >
> >> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
> >>
> >> Ok.
> >
> > Thanks, should I backport this to gcc-6-branch now? Or wait until after
> > 6.1?
>
> It's fine to backport now as it's probably a regression.
Yes, it is (gcc5 worked). Will backport now then.
Marek
