Hi, On 18 Apr 21:13, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:40 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:32 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Since *mov<mode>_internal and <avx512>_(load|store)<mode>_mask patterns > >>> can handle unaligned load and store, we can remove UNSPEC_LOADU and > >>> UNSPEC_STOREU. We use function prototypes with pointer to scalar for > >>> unaligned load/store builtin functions so that memory passed to > >>> *mov<mode>_internal is unaligned. > >>> > >>> Tested on x86-64. Is this OK for trunk in stage 3? > >> > >> This patch is not appropriate for stage 3. > >> > >> Uros. > >> > >>> H.J. > >>> ---- > > > > > > Here is the updated patch for GCC 7. Tested on x86-64. OK for > > trrunk? > > IIRC from previous discussion, are we sure we won't propagate > unaligned memory into SSE arithmetic insns? > > Otherwise, the patch is OK, but please wait for Kirill for AVX512 approval. I am ok with it. > > Thanks, > Uros.
-- Thanks, K
