It is hard to tell. Can you double check indentation on
+ if (can_create_pseudo_p () && <MODE>mode != SImode)
+ {
+ rtx tmp = gen_rtx_REG (<MODE>mode, 0);
+ emit_insn (gen_extendsidi2 (tmp, operands[2]));
+ operands[2] = tmp;
+ }
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, fixed.
>
> Updated patch is attached.
>
> K
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:04 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No need for () in "(mode == SImode)":
>>
>> + && !optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun)
>> + && ((mode == SImode) || (mode == DImode && TARGET_64BIT))
>>
>> Wrong placement of '{':
>>
>> + if (can_create_pseudo_p () && <MODE>mode != SImode) {
>> + rtx tmp = gen_rtx_REG (<MODE>mode, 0);
>> + emit_insn (gen_extendsidi2 (tmp, operands[2]));
>> + operands[2] = tmp;
>> + }
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks!
>>> Fixed, updated patch is attached.
>>>
>>> Is it ok?
>>>
>>> Thanks, K
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:18:19PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>>>>> Thanks, it is fixed.
>>>>> Update patch is attached.
>>>>
>>>> + /* We generatin RORX instruction, freedom of register +
>>>> + flags not affected */
>>>>
>>>> comment doesn't look to be correct english (missing verb, missing g at
>>>> the end of generating, missing dot at the end of sentence).
>>>>
>>>> Jakub
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>>
>
--
H.J.
