On 04/13/2016 11:05 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
As it happens, anyway, the below exceedingly trivial patch avoids the ICE in resolve_typename_type and appears to pass testing (is already past g++.dg/tm/tm.exp...). Should I apply it instead together with the amended testcase? Weird that nobody noticed the pair of typos before!?!
OK. Jason
