While working on PR50067, with some local changes I made them fail. Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard. 2011-08-19 Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> * gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-1.c: New testcase. * gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-2.c: Likewise. Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-1.c =================================================================== --- testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-1.c (revision 0) +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-1.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ + +/* Make sure data-dependence analysis does not compute a bogus + distance vector for the different sized accesses. */ + +extern int memcmp(const void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__); +extern void abort (void); +short a[32] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 }; +short b[32] = { 4, 0, 5, 0, 6, 0, 7, 0, 8, 0, }; +int main() +{ + int i; + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) + (*((unsigned short(*)[32])&a[0]))[i] = (*((char(*)[32])&a[0]))[i+8]; + if (memcmp (&a, &b, sizeof (a)) != 0) + abort (); + return 0; +} Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-2.c =================================================================== --- testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-2.c (revision 0) +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr50067-2.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ + +/* Make sure data-dependence analysis does not compute a bogus + distance vector for the different sized accesses. */ + +extern int memcmp(const void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__); +extern void abort (void); +short a[32] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 }; +short b[32] = { 4, 0, 5, 0, 6, 0, 7, 0, 8, 0, }; +int main() +{ + int i; + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) + { + a[i] = (*((char(*)[32])&a[0]))[i+8]; + } + if (memcmp (&a, &b, sizeof (a)) != 0) + abort (); + return 0; +}