On 04/06/2016 04:13 PM, Yvan Roux wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 17:09, Pedro Alves <pal...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 04/06/2016 03:53 PM, Yvan Roux wrote: >>> Dejagnu cleanup mechanism needs to be enhanced, but I think that it >>> would also be better if guality tests don't get stuck and/or can be >>> killed easily. This patch changes GDB signals handling to nostop for >>> SIGSEGV, SIGINT, SIGTERM and SIGBUS. I am not sure if we need to >>> increase the list of signals to all the stop ones (which are not used >>> by GDB) or to restrict it just to SIGSEGV. >> >> I'd suggest: >> >> handle all pass nostop >> handle SIGINT pass nostop >> >> That would make gdb pass _all_ signals except SIGTRAP > > I've committed it already :/ > > I can make the change, but isn't there cases where SIGILL is used for > breakpoints in GDB (I think I've seen that somewhere).
True, and SIGSEGV and SIGEMT too. But GDB handles that transparently and won't pass such a breakpoint signal to the program, even with "handle pass". Only "handle SIGTRAP pass" passes a breakpoint/step/etc. trap to the program. Thanks, Pedro Alves
