Hi!

As the testcase below shows, we can end up with lots of useless
instructions from multi-word arithmetics.
simplify-rtx.c can optimize x {&,|,^}= {0,-1}, but while
x &= 0 or x {|,^}= -1 are optimized into constants and CSE can handle those
fine, we keep x &= -1 and x {|,^}= 0 in the IL until expansion if x
is a MEM.  There are two issues, one is that cse_insn has for a few years
code that wants to prevent partially overlapping MEM->MEM moves,
but actually doesn't realize that fully overlapping MEM->MEM noop moves
are fine.  And the second one is that on most backends, there are no
MEM->MEM move instructions, so we need to delete the useless insns instead,
because it can't match.

Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
Is this something we want for 6.x or defer for stage1?

2016-04-01  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR rtl-optimization/70467
        * cse.c (cse_insn): Handle no-op MEM moves after folding.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr70467-1.c: New test.

--- gcc/cse.c.jj        2016-04-01 12:12:22.630602270 +0200
+++ gcc/cse.c   2016-04-01 12:18:03.509947871 +0200
@@ -5166,7 +5166,7 @@ cse_insn (rtx_insn *insn)
            }
 
          /* Avoid creation of overlapping memory moves.  */
-         if (MEM_P (trial) && MEM_P (SET_DEST (sets[i].rtl)))
+         if (MEM_P (trial) && MEM_P (dest) && !rtx_equal_p (trial, dest))
            {
              rtx src, dest;
 
@@ -5277,6 +5277,20 @@ cse_insn (rtx_insn *insn)
              break;
            }
 
+         /* Similarly, lots of targets don't allow no-op
+            (set (mem x) (mem x)) moves.  */
+         else if (n_sets == 1
+                  && MEM_P (trial)
+                  && MEM_P (dest)
+                  && rtx_equal_p (trial, dest)
+                  && !side_effects_p (dest)
+                  && (cfun->can_delete_dead_exceptions
+                      || insn_nothrow_p (insn)))
+           {
+             SET_SRC (sets[i].rtl) = trial;
+             break;
+           }
+
          /* Reject certain invalid forms of CONST that we create.  */
          else if (CONSTANT_P (trial)
                   && GET_CODE (trial) == CONST
@@ -5495,6 +5509,21 @@ cse_insn (rtx_insn *insn)
          sets[i].rtl = 0;
        }
 
+      /* Similarly for no-op MEM moves.  */
+      else if (n_sets == 1
+              && MEM_P (SET_DEST (sets[i].rtl))
+              && MEM_P (SET_SRC (sets[i].rtl))
+              && rtx_equal_p (SET_DEST (sets[i].rtl),
+                              SET_SRC (sets[i].rtl))
+              && !side_effects_p (SET_DEST (sets[i].rtl))
+              && (cfun->can_delete_dead_exceptions || insn_nothrow_p (insn)))
+       {
+         if (cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions && can_throw_internal (insn))
+           cse_cfg_altered = true;
+         delete_insn_and_edges (insn);
+         sets[i].rtl = 0;
+       }
+
       /* If this SET is now setting PC to a label, we know it used to
         be a conditional or computed branch.  */
       else if (dest == pc_rtx && GET_CODE (src) == LABEL_REF
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70467-1.c.jj        2016-04-01 
12:13:06.945997183 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr70467-1.c   2016-04-01 12:17:12.187648630 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+/* PR rtl-optimization/70467 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mno-sse" } */
+
+void foo (unsigned long long *);
+
+void
+bar (void)
+{
+  unsigned long long a;
+  foo (&a);
+  a &= 0x7fffffffffffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a &= 0xffffffff7fffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a &= 0x7fffffff00000000ULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a &= 0x000000007fffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a &= 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a &= 0xffffffff00000000ULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a |= 0x7fffffffffffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a |= 0xffffffff7fffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a |= 0x7fffffff00000000ULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a |= 0x000000007fffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a |= 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a |= 0xffffffff00000000ULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a ^= 0x7fffffffffffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a ^= 0xffffffff7fffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a ^= 0x7fffffff00000000ULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a ^= 0x000000007fffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a ^= 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
+  foo (&a);
+  a ^= 0xffffffff00000000ULL;
+  foo (&a);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "andl\[ \t\]*.-1," { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "andl\[ \t\]*.0," { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "orl\[ \t\]*.-1," { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "orl\[ \t\]*.0," { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "xorl\[ \t\]*.-1," { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "xorl\[ \t\]*.0," { target ia32 } } } */

        Jakub

Reply via email to