On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen <naveen.hurugalaw...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: >>> With -O1 there is -fno-strict-overflow in effect which is not >>> TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED. > > Thanks for the details. The below code has the following condition > and hence not working for O1. > if (FLOAT_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type))
Yes, and that's correct. > Then PR23471 is fixed with the current sources. Yes. Richard. > Thanks, > Naveen
