On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/17/2016 04:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/17/2016 04:13 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>> >>>> We can add an effective target, something like ignore_pic_pie, and >>>> use it instead of *-*-darwin*. >>> >>> >>> >>> That should have been done _before_ committing the patch in a form that >>> was >>> not approved. >>> >> >> How should we move forward? > > > Maybe an effective target pic_default, which tests whether __PIC__ is > defined without any options. Please prepare a patch. >
That isn't sufficient for Darwin since it ignores -fno-pic and -fno-pie. -- H.J.
