On Mar 11, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote: > AFAICT pr45076 is fixed on the gcc-4.9, gcc-5 branches, and trunk. I have > borrowed the machinery in g++.dg/tree-prof/tree-prof.exp for the attached > patch and tested it on the three branches. Is it OK as such or is there a > better way to do the testing?
Ok. [ As always, anyone should feel free to chime in with suggestions, objections and improvements, if they know of any. ]
