On 02/03/16 09:38 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
On Mar 2, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote:
PING ^ 2. The patch is sitting without comments for 4+ months.
So the libstdc++ people are usually pretty active and responsive, I usually let
them review these sorts of patches as domain experts. I only kick in if they
are unreasonably absent. Reviewing the case, I don’t see any hint that the
libstdc++ list was ever sent an email. You will want to include it in any
patches and pings.
Thanks for forwarding this, Mike.
Libstdc++ patches need to be sent to the libstdc++ list, see both
https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/appendix_contributing.html#list.patches
I don't comment on patches I'm not aware of :-)
I did look at the patch, and it does seem reasonable. Given that the libstdc+
folks never saw it, I’lll defer to them. You can ping patches once a week, if
you would like.
Paolo and I are both attending the WG21 C++ meeting this week. I'm
busy and have not had much time to keep up with email, but I'll review
the patch ASAP.
