On 3 March 2016 at 15:39, Patrick Palka <patr...@parcs.ath.cx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez > <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It would be an overall improvement if it was neither a TREE_LIST, nor a >> TREE_VECTOR: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Speedup_areas#Trees >> >> Those kinds of cleanups are always welcome even if they do not improve >> performance noticeably at first glance. The speed-up will show up once >> TREE_LIST is removed completely. > > Ah yeah, I meant if cp_binding_level::names were a vec<tree, va_gc> > since it would have to be resizable.
Sure, what I meant is that such a change is an improvement even if you cannot measure any speed-up at all right now. Go for it! Cheers, Manuel.
