On 02/11/2016 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+ && !integer_zerop (tree_strip_nop_conversions (op1)))
Maybe cp_fold rather than tree_strip_nop_conversions? Jason
On 02/11/2016 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+ && !integer_zerop (tree_strip_nop_conversions (op1)))
Maybe cp_fold rather than tree_strip_nop_conversions? Jason