Hi, On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, David Malcolm wrote:
> > +static timevar_id_t global_phase; > > FWIW I like the idea, but could this be a private field within class > timer, rather than a global? Sure, consider the patch amended accordingly. Ciao, Michael.
Hi, On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, David Malcolm wrote:
> > +static timevar_id_t global_phase; > > FWIW I like the idea, but could this be a private field within class > timer, rather than a global? Sure, consider the patch amended accordingly. Ciao, Michael.