On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:32:08AM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> As it happens the patch I did over a year ago for PR64682 isn't quite >> correct. This is PR69567. This fixes it. >> >> Tested on the separate testcases; also did bootstrap + testsuite on >> powerpc64-linux and x86_64-linux. I'll commit this tomorrow or so if >> no one sees something wrong with it. >> >> >> 2016-02-02 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> >> >> PR rtl-optimization/64682 >> PR rtl-optimization/69567 >> * combine.c (distribute_notes) <REG_DEAD>: Place the death note >> before I2 only if the register is both used and set in I2. > > Committed to mainline and 5 now. >
This caused: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O3 -g execution test on x86 on GCC 5 branch. Trunk is OK. Did you miss a backport from trunk? -- H.J.
